New Zealand vs Tunisia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

New Zealand
0.7995 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
108th
Tunisia rank
107th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • New Zealand
  • Tunisia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7995 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 159 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.6314 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8659 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.7287 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9661 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.665 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.7349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.8514 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.8089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), New Zealand or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7995 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between New Zealand and Tunisia?
0.1126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Tunisia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
New Zealand ranks 108th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Tunisia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/tunisia/">New Zealand vs Tunisia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.