Mali vs Nicaragua: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mali
2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
2.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
81st
Nicaragua rank
83rd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mali
  • Nicaragua
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Mali ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 83rd of 159 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2551 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5685 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0.2634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.3611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9965 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6354 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.5343 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.8573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3671 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 2.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mali or Nicaragua?
Mali, at 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mali and Nicaragua?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mali and Nicaragua rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mali ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 83rd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Nicaragua: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mali/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mali/nicaragua/">Mali vs Nicaragua: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.