Libya vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Libya
0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
149th
Namibia rank
147th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 147th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1970s 0.0236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1980s 0.0358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.0259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0273 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0344 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 0.0266 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Libya or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Libya and Namibia?
0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Libya ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 147th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.