Lesotho vs Tunisia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Lesotho
0.9572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
105th
Tunisia rank
107th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Lesotho
  • Tunisia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0.9572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.8203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.7601 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Lesotho or Tunisia?
Lesotho, at 0.9572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Lesotho and Tunisia?
0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Tunisia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Lesotho ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 107th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Tunisia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/tunisia/">Lesotho vs Tunisia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.