Jordan vs Yemen: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Jordan
0.1944 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Yemen
0.1904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
127th
Yemen rank
128th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Jordan
  • Yemen
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.1944 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Yemen, a difference of 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 127th and Yemen ranks 128th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Yemen Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3922 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0.3012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
1980s 0.2432 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3063 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0631 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
1990s 0.2131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0975 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
2000s 0.1248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2859 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
2010s 0.1723 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Yemen
2020s 0.2042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Jordan or Yemen?
Jordan, at 0.1944 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Yemen as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Jordan and Yemen?
0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Yemen?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Yemen rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Jordan ranks 127th and Yemen ranks 128th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Yemen: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jordan/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jordan/yemen-rep/">Jordan vs Yemen: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.