Jordan vs Mauritania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Jordan
0.1944 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.2016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
127th
Mauritania rank
126th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Jordan
  • Mauritania
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.2016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1944 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 127th and Mauritania ranks 126th of 159 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5433 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.522 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0.3012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2903 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 0.2432 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2164 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 0.2131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1665 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 0.1248 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0461 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 0.1723 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0644 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 0.2042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1741 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Jordan or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0.2016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1944 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Jordan and Mauritania?
0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Mauritania rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Jordan ranks 127th and Mauritania ranks 126th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Mauritania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jordan/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jordan/mauritania/">Jordan vs Mauritania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.