Israel vs Malaysia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Israel
2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
77th
Malaysia rank
76th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Israel
  • Malaysia
12345196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 77th and Malaysia ranks 76th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 4 and Malaysia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1970s 2.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1980s 3.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9505 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
1990s 2.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Israel
2000s 2.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 2.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3894 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 2.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.178 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Israel or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Israel and Malaysia?
0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Malaysia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Israel ranks 77th and Malaysia ranks 76th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Malaysia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/israel/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/israel/malaysia/">Israel vs Malaysia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.