Ireland vs Uganda: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ireland
5.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
6.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
53rd
Uganda rank
50th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ireland
  • Uganda
2468196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 6.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 5.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 53rd and Uganda ranks 50th of 159 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 3.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 4.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 6.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 5.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 6.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 6.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 6.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ireland or Uganda?
Uganda, at 6.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 5.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ireland and Uganda?
0.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Uganda rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ireland ranks 53rd and Uganda ranks 50th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Uganda: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ireland/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ireland/uganda/">Ireland vs Uganda: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.