Iraq vs Malaysia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iraq
2.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
74th
Malaysia rank
76th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iraq
  • Malaysia
012345196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 2.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Iraq ranks 74th and Malaysia ranks 76th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3885 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 2.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 3.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iraq or Malaysia?
Iraq, at 2.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iraq and Malaysia?
0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Malaysia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iraq ranks 74th and Malaysia ranks 76th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Malaysia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iraq/malaysia/">Iraq vs Malaysia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.