Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Hungary
35.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
29.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
4th
Sri Lanka rank
7th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Hungary
  • Sri Lanka
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 35.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 29.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 6.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 7th of 159 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 17.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 27.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 34.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 28.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 31.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 33.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 31.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 29.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Hungary or Sri Lanka?
Hungary, at 35.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 29.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Hungary and Sri Lanka?
6.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Sri Lanka rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Hungary ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 7th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/hungary/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/hungary/sri-lanka/">Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.