Guinea-Bissau vs Mexico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guinea-Bissau
3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
3.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
66th
Mexico rank
65th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Mexico
1234196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 3.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and Mexico ranks 65th of 159 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7664 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 1.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6928 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 1.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 2.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 3.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guinea-Bissau or Mexico?
Mexico, at 3.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guinea-Bissau and Mexico?
0.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mexico?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Mexico rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 66th and Mexico ranks 65th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Mexico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/mexico/">Guinea-Bissau vs Mexico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.