Guatemala vs Mexico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guatemala
4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
3.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
63rd
Mexico rank
65th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mexico
1234196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 63rd and Mexico ranks 65th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0769 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 1.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 2.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 2.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5956 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 3.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1202 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 4.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1473 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guatemala or Mexico?
Guatemala, at 4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guatemala and Mexico?
0.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mexico rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Guatemala ranks 63rd and Mexico ranks 65th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mexico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mexico/">Guatemala vs Mexico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.