Gabon vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Gabon
0.0386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon rank
144th
Namibia rank
147th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Gabon
  • Namibia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 0.0386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Gabon ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 147th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0249 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0301 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0258 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0377 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gabon
2020s 0.0386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0445 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Gabon or Namibia?
Gabon, at 0.0386 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Gabon and Namibia?
0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gabon and Namibia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Gabon ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 147th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gabon vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/gabon/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/gabon/namibia/">Gabon vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.