El Salvador vs Malawi: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

El Salvador
8.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
8.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
32nd
Malawi rank
33rd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Malawi
246810196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 8.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 32nd and Malawi ranks 33rd of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 4.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 6.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 7.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 8.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 8.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 9.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 9.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), El Salvador or Malawi?
El Salvador, at 8.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between El Salvador and Malawi?
0.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Malawi rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
El Salvador ranks 32nd and Malawi ranks 33rd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Malawi: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/malawi/">El Salvador vs Malawi: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.