Ecuador vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
2.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
71st
Morocco rank
73rd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Morocco
0246196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.

Ecuador ranks 71st and Morocco ranks 73rd of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 0.6529 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6913 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 2.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0821 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 3.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2489 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Morocco?
Ecuador, at 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Morocco?
0.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Morocco rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 71st and Morocco ranks 73rd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/morocco/">Ecuador vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.