Ecuador vs Gambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
3.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
71st
Gambia rank
69th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Gambia
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 3.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 71st and Gambia ranks 69th of 159 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 0.6529 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 2.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 3.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 3.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2341 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Gambia?
Gambia, at 3.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Gambia?
0.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Gambia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 71st and Gambia ranks 69th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Gambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/gambia-the/">Ecuador vs Gambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.