Congo vs Vanuatu: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Vanuatu
0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
151st
Vanuatu rank
154th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Vanuatu
0.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.4 times Vanuatu's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Congo ranks 151st and Vanuatu ranks 154th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Vanuatu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Vanuatu
1990s 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Vanuatu
2000s 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0145 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0159 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Vanuatu?
Congo, at 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0162 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Vanuatu as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Vanuatu?
0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Vanuatu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Vanuatu rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 151st and Vanuatu ranks 154th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Vanuatu: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/vanuatu/">Congo vs Vanuatu: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.