Chile vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.7492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
109th
Zimbabwe rank
106th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.1819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Chile ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2283 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.5292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.595 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.6837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.8394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6533 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4186 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.8066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.9311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.7492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Zimbabwe?
0.1819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.