Chile vs Mozambique: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.7492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.6728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
109th
Mozambique rank
111th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Mozambique
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.7492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.6728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0764 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 109th and Mozambique ranks 111th of 159 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.5292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.6837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1933 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4904 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.8394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.532 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.9986 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4491 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.8066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1463 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Mozambique?
Chile, at 0.7492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.6728 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Mozambique?
0.0764 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mozambique rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 109th and Mozambique ranks 111th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mozambique: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/mozambique/">Chile vs Mozambique: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.