Botswana vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Botswana
0.0284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
148th
Congo rank
151st

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Botswana
  • Congo
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 148th and Congo ranks 151st of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0129 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana
1970s 0.0244 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0186 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Botswana or Congo?
Botswana, at 0.0284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Botswana and Congo?
0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Botswana ranks 148th and Congo ranks 151st of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/botswana/congo-rep/">Botswana vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.