Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Uzbekistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
4.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
60th
Uzbekistan rank
62nd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Uzbekistan
2468199220072023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 4.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 60th and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 159 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 4.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 4.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 5.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 5.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Uzbekistan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 4.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uzbekistan?
0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uzbekistan?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Uzbekistan rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 60th and Uzbekistan ranks 62nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Uzbekistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/uzbekistan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Uzbekistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.