Barbados vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados
0.0209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
153rd
Congo rank
151st

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Barbados
  • Congo
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 153rd and Congo ranks 151st of 159 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.437 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.8895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8778 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.9802 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0104 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9699 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.5863 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.1223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0229 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Congo?
0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Congo rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Barbados ranks 153rd and Congo ranks 151st of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/congo-rep/">Barbados vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.