Australia vs Liberia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
99th
Liberia rank
98th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Liberia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Australia ranks 99th and Liberia ranks 98th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Liberia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5517 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1970s 0.5038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9322 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 0.6751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4823 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 0.8059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4993 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.9444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0339 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Liberia?
Liberia, at 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Liberia?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Liberia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 99th and Liberia ranks 98th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Liberia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/liberia/">Australia vs Liberia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,875 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.