New Caledonia vs Qatar: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0.1923 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
166th
Qatar rank
163rd

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Qatar
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.1923 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0329 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 166th and Qatar ranks 163rd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 4 and Qatar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0724 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0724 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0614 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0249 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0364 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.1082 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1533 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0451 metric tons per square kilometre Qatar
1990s 0.0696 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4146 metric tons per square kilometre 0.345 metric tons per square kilometre Qatar
2000s 0.2615 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4913 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2298 metric tons per square kilometre Qatar
2010s 0.3503 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1634 metric tons per square kilometre 0.187 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.339 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1787 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1603 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.1923 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Qatar?
0.0329 metric tons per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Qatar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Qatar rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 166th and Qatar ranks 163rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Qatar: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/qatar/">New Caledonia vs Qatar: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.