Namibia vs New Caledonia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Namibia
0.1859 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
164th
New Caledonia rank
166th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • New Caledonia
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1859 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0265 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Namibia ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 166th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0529 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0724 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0196 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0748 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0614 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0134 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0962 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1082 metric tons per square kilometre 0.012 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.1152 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0696 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0455 metric tons per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.1471 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2615 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1144 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.1385 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3503 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2118 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.1955 metric tons per square kilometre 0.339 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1435 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Namibia or New Caledonia?
Namibia, at 0.1859 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Namibia and New Caledonia?
0.0265 metric tons per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and New Caledonia rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs New Caledonia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/namibia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/namibia/new-caledonia/">Namibia vs New Caledonia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.