Myanmar vs United States: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Myanmar
43.33 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
50.58 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
35th
United States rank
32nd

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Myanmar
  • United States
102030405060196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 50.58 metric tons per square kilometre against 43.33 metric tons per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 7.25 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States ahead.

Myanmar ranks 35th and United States ranks 32nd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and United States in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar United States Difference Ahead
1960s 12.02 metric tons per square kilometre 19.97 metric tons per square kilometre 7.95 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1970s 14.02 metric tons per square kilometre 26.72 metric tons per square kilometre 12.7 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1980s 22.21 metric tons per square kilometre 31.55 metric tons per square kilometre 9.35 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1990s 26.33 metric tons per square kilometre 34.89 metric tons per square kilometre 8.56 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2000s 43.13 metric tons per square kilometre 39.78 metric tons per square kilometre 3.35 metric tons per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 45.69 metric tons per square kilometre 46.53 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8436 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2020s 45.21 metric tons per square kilometre 47.96 metric tons per square kilometre 2.75 metric tons per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Myanmar or United States?
United States, at 50.58 metric tons per square kilometre against 43.33 metric tons per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Myanmar and United States?
7.25 metric tons per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and United States?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and United States rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Myanmar ranks 35th and United States ranks 32nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs United States: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/united-states/">Myanmar vs United States: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.