Mauritania vs Saudi Arabia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mauritania
0.5627 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.555 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
151st
Saudi Arabia rank
152nd

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Saudi Arabia
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.5627 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.555 metric tons per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0077 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 151st and Saudi Arabia ranks 152nd of 181 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0954 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1882 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0928 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1970s 0.0462 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1297 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0835 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.0982 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8638 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7656 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.1634 metric tons per square kilometre 1.62 metric tons per square kilometre 1.46 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.1545 metric tons per square kilometre 1.25 metric tons per square kilometre 1.09 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.3194 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6422 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3227 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.4938 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5106 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0167 metric tons per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Saudi Arabia?
Mauritania, at 0.5627 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.555 metric tons per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Saudi Arabia?
0.0077 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Saudi Arabia rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 151st and Saudi Arabia ranks 152nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Saudi Arabia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/saudi-arabia/">Mauritania vs Saudi Arabia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.