Low & middle income vs Romania: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Low & middle income
26.92 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
90.34 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
16th
Romania rank
17th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Romania
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 90.34 metric tons per square kilometre against 26.92 metric tons per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 63.42 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 3.4 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 16th and Romania ranks 17th of 47 groups.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 6.83 metric tons per square kilometre 51.83 metric tons per square kilometre 45 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1970s 9.47 metric tons per square kilometre 69.47 metric tons per square kilometre 59.99 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1980s 12.93 metric tons per square kilometre 81.3 metric tons per square kilometre 68.37 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
1990s 15.91 metric tons per square kilometre 74.57 metric tons per square kilometre 58.65 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2000s 18.45 metric tons per square kilometre 67.72 metric tons per square kilometre 49.27 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2010s 23.49 metric tons per square kilometre 97.16 metric tons per square kilometre 73.67 metric tons per square kilometre Romania
2020s 26.36 metric tons per square kilometre 93 metric tons per square kilometre 66.64 metric tons per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Low & middle income or Romania?
Romania, at 90.34 metric tons per square kilometre against 26.92 metric tons per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Low & middle income and Romania?
63.42 metric tons per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Romania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Romania rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Low & middle income ranks 16th and Romania ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Romania: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/romania/">Low & middle income vs Romania: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.