El Salvador vs North Korea: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

El Salvador
42.52 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea
39.76 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
36th
North Korea rank
38th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • North Korea
20406080196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 42.52 metric tons per square kilometre against 39.76 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 2.76 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times North Korea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was North Korea ahead.

El Salvador ranks 36th and North Korea ranks 38th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and North Korea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador North Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 17.65 metric tons per square kilometre 32.47 metric tons per square kilometre 14.82 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1970s 28.42 metric tons per square kilometre 42.69 metric tons per square kilometre 14.26 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 33.36 metric tons per square kilometre 49.56 metric tons per square kilometre 16.19 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 40.35 metric tons per square kilometre 47.95 metric tons per square kilometre 7.59 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 41.92 metric tons per square kilometre 35.08 metric tons per square kilometre 6.84 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 46.94 metric tons per square kilometre 40.76 metric tons per square kilometre 6.18 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 43.95 metric tons per square kilometre 39.38 metric tons per square kilometre 4.57 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, El Salvador or North Korea?
El Salvador, at 42.52 metric tons per square kilometre against 39.76 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between El Salvador and North Korea?
2.76 metric tons per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and North Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and North Korea rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 36th and North Korea ranks 38th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs North Korea: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">El Salvador vs North Korea: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.