East Asia & Pacific vs Poland: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
38.69 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
114.88 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
8th
Poland rank
9th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Poland
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 114.88 metric tons per square kilometre against 38.69 metric tons per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 76.19 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 3.0 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 8th and Poland ranks 9th of 47 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 10.53 metric tons per square kilometre 52.3 metric tons per square kilometre 41.78 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1970s 14.86 metric tons per square kilometre 65.32 metric tons per square kilometre 50.46 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1980s 20.63 metric tons per square kilometre 75.75 metric tons per square kilometre 55.12 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
1990s 25.65 metric tons per square kilometre 81.78 metric tons per square kilometre 56.13 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2000s 28.04 metric tons per square kilometre 85.71 metric tons per square kilometre 57.68 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2010s 35.82 metric tons per square kilometre 93.88 metric tons per square kilometre 58.06 metric tons per square kilometre Poland
2020s 38.6 metric tons per square kilometre 113.67 metric tons per square kilometre 75.07 metric tons per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Poland?
Poland, at 114.88 metric tons per square kilometre against 38.69 metric tons per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Poland?
76.19 metric tons per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Poland rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 8th and Poland ranks 9th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Poland: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/poland/">East Asia & Pacific vs Poland: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.