Congo vs Solomon Islands: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Congo
0.0889 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.0983 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
173rd
Solomon Islands rank
172nd

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Solomon Islands
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.0983 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0889 metric tons per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0094 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 173rd and Solomon Islands ranks 172nd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0281 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0203 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0078 metric tons per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0458 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1354 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0896 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1980s 0.0471 metric tons per square kilometre 0.242 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1949 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 0.0273 metric tons per square kilometre 0.088 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0607 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 0.0595 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0989 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0394 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 0.0816 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0979 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0162 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0.0889 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0982 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0093 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Congo or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0.0983 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0889 metric tons per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Congo and Solomon Islands?
0.0094 metric tons per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Solomon Islands rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 173rd and Solomon Islands ranks 172nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Solomon Islands: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/solomon-islands/">Congo vs Solomon Islands: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.