Cambodia vs OECD members: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cambodia
81.46 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
26.33 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
20th
OECD members rank
18th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cambodia
  • OECD members
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 81.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 26.33 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 55.13 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 3.1 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 18th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and OECD members in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 15.3 metric tons per square kilometre 11.94 metric tons per square kilometre 3.36 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 8.91 metric tons per square kilometre 15.39 metric tons per square kilometre 6.48 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1980s 11.27 metric tons per square kilometre 18.68 metric tons per square kilometre 7.41 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1990s 17.08 metric tons per square kilometre 20.49 metric tons per square kilometre 3.41 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
2000s 33.04 metric tons per square kilometre 22.63 metric tons per square kilometre 10.4 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 59.26 metric tons per square kilometre 25.04 metric tons per square kilometre 34.23 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 73.52 metric tons per square kilometre 26.01 metric tons per square kilometre 47.51 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cambodia or OECD members?
Cambodia, at 81.46 metric tons per square kilometre against 26.33 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cambodia and OECD members?
55.13 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and OECD members?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and OECD members rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cambodia ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 18th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs OECD members: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/oecd-members/">Cambodia vs OECD members: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.