Burkina Faso vs Paraguay: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
18.82 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
17.35 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
71st
Paraguay rank
74th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Paraguay
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 18.82 metric tons per square kilometre against 17.35 metric tons per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 1.47 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 71st and Paraguay ranks 74th of 181 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 3.52 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5132 metric tons per square kilometre 3 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1970s 3.82 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9722 metric tons per square kilometre 2.85 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 5.45 metric tons per square kilometre 1.5 metric tons per square kilometre 3.94 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 8.54 metric tons per square kilometre 2.64 metric tons per square kilometre 5.91 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 12.21 metric tons per square kilometre 5.49 metric tons per square kilometre 6.71 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 16.6 metric tons per square kilometre 15.97 metric tons per square kilometre 0.625 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 18.43 metric tons per square kilometre 17.83 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5965 metric tons per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Paraguay?
Burkina Faso, at 18.82 metric tons per square kilometre against 17.35 metric tons per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Paraguay?
1.47 metric tons per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Paraguay rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 71st and Paraguay ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Paraguay: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/paraguay/">Burkina Faso vs Paraguay: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.