Botswana vs New Caledonia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Botswana
0.1316 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
167th
New Caledonia rank
166th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • New Caledonia
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1316 metric tons per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0278 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 167th and New Caledonia ranks 166th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0584 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0724 metric tons per square kilometre 0.014 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.113 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0614 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0517 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0705 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1082 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0377 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0817 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0696 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0121 metric tons per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0615 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2615 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.0841 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3503 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2662 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.2093 metric tons per square kilometre 0.339 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1297 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Botswana or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.1594 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1316 metric tons per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Botswana and New Caledonia?
0.0278 metric tons per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and New Caledonia rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 167th and New Caledonia ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs New Caledonia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/botswana/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/botswana/new-caledonia/">Botswana vs New Caledonia: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.