Bhutan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bhutan
1.83 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
1.86 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
135th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
134th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
012345196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 1.86 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.83 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.03 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 135th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 134th of 181 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 2.36 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2328 metric tons per square kilometre 2.13 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 2.99 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3282 metric tons per square kilometre 2.66 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 3.21 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4948 metric tons per square kilometre 2.71 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 3.28 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6838 metric tons per square kilometre 2.6 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 3.76 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6752 metric tons per square kilometre 3.09 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 4.23 metric tons per square kilometre 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre 2.87 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 2.11 metric tons per square kilometre 1.75 metric tons per square kilometre 0.366 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 1.86 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.83 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.03 metric tons per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Democratic Republic of Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 135th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 134th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/congo-dem-rep/">Bhutan vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.