Belgium vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Belgium
90.34 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
26.67 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
16th
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
17th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
20406080100196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 90.34 metric tons per square kilometre against 26.67 metric tons per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 63.67 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 3.4 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 16th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 90.87 metric tons per square kilometre 19.21 metric tons per square kilometre 71.66 metric tons per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 94.39 metric tons per square kilometre 25.43 metric tons per square kilometre 68.96 metric tons per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 86.52 metric tons per square kilometre 27.22 metric tons per square kilometre 59.3 metric tons per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Belgium or Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
Belgium, at 90.34 metric tons per square kilometre against 26.67 metric tons per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Belgium and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
63.67 metric tons per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 16th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belgium/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/belgium/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/">Belgium vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.