Antigua and Barbuda vs Libya: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
0.1182 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
169th
Libya rank
168th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Libya
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.1182 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Libya ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Libya ranks 168th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0699 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0984 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre Libya
1970s 0.1293 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1126 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0167 metric tons per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.1075 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1619 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0544 metric tons per square kilometre Libya
1990s 0.113 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1155 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre Libya
2000s 0.1339 metric tons per square kilometre 0.124 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0099 metric tons per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.1427 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1535 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0107 metric tons per square kilometre Libya
2020s 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0014 metric tons per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Libya?
Libya, at 0.1182 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Libya?
0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Libya?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Libya rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Libya ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Libya: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/libya/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Libya: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.