Antigua and Barbuda vs Cape Verde: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde
0.1151 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
169th
Cape Verde rank
170th

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cape Verde
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1151 metric tons per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Cape Verde ranks 170th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Cape Verde in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0699 metric tons per square kilometre 3.66 metric tons per square kilometre 3.59 metric tons per square kilometre Cape Verde
1970s 0.1293 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5663 metric tons per square kilometre 0.437 metric tons per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 0.1075 metric tons per square kilometre 2.03 metric tons per square kilometre 1.93 metric tons per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 0.113 metric tons per square kilometre 2.84 metric tons per square kilometre 2.73 metric tons per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 0.1339 metric tons per square kilometre 2.51 metric tons per square kilometre 2.37 metric tons per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 0.1427 metric tons per square kilometre 1.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8783 metric tons per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0972 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0203 metric tons per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Cape Verde?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1151 metric tons per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Cape Verde?
0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cape Verde?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cape Verde rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Cape Verde ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Cape Verde: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cabo-verde/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Cape Verde: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.