Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados
0.0991 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
169th
Barbados rank
171st

Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Barbados
0246196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0991 metric tons per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0184 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Barbados ranks 171st of 181 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0699 metric tons per square kilometre 2.93 metric tons per square kilometre 2.86 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 0.1293 metric tons per square kilometre 4.44 metric tons per square kilometre 4.31 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.1075 metric tons per square kilometre 4.88 metric tons per square kilometre 4.78 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.113 metric tons per square kilometre 2.92 metric tons per square kilometre 2.81 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.1339 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6096 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4758 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.1427 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3982 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2555 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1334 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0159 metric tons per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Barbados?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.1175 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0991 metric tons per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
0.0184 metric tons per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Barbados rank globally for cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and Barbados ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/barbados/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Barbados: Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 13,192 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereal production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.