United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value

United Republic of Tanzania
1.8 %
in 2021
Viet Nam
15.4 %
in 2021
United Republic of Tanzania rank
16th
Viet Nam rank
13th

Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Viet Nam
-20-1001020200020102021

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 15.4 % against 1.8 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 13.6 %.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 8.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 17 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, United Republic of Tanzania averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 10.46 % -12.32 % 22.78 % United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 5.4 % 1.28 % 4.12 % United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.45 % 15.4 % 14.95 % Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, United Republic of Tanzania or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 15.4 % against 1.8 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2021.
What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
13.6 %, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 17 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/united-republic-of-tanzania/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/united-republic-of-tanzania/viet-nam-2/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 4,414 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.