Solomon Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value

Solomon Islands
100 %
in 2021
United Arab Emirates
100 %
in 2021
Solomon Islands rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st

Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080100200020102021

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 100 % against 100 % in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0 %.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 158 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 92.14 % 98.09 % 5.95 % United Arab Emirates
2010s 94.95 % 99.7 % 4.75 % United Arab Emirates
2020s 100 % 98.85 % 1.15 % Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Solomon Islands or United Arab Emirates?
Solomon Islands, at 100 % against 100 % in United Arab Emirates as of 2021.
What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Solomon Islands and United Arab Emirates?
0 %, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and United Arab Emirates?
14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Solomon Islands and United Arab Emirates rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/solomon-islands/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/solomon-islands/united-arab-emirates/">Solomon Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 4,414 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.