Luxembourg vs Mongolia: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Luxembourg
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 39.3 % against 38.7 % in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.6 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mongolia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 94th and Mongolia ranks 93rd of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.01 % | 61.12 % | 54.11 % | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 21.52 % | 39.36 % | 17.84 % | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 38.7 % | 38.35 % | 0.35 % | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Luxembourg or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 39.3 % against 38.7 % in Luxembourg as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Luxembourg and Mongolia?
- 0.6 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mongolia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Mongolia rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Luxembourg ranks 94th and Mongolia ranks 93rd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.