Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
17.2 %
in 2021
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
98.5 %
in 2021
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
12th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
16th

Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
20406080100200020102021

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 98.5 % against 17.2 % in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 81.3 %.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 5.7 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 12th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 16th of 17 groups.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2000s 13.19 % 96.44 % 83.25 % Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 14.36 % 95.89 % 81.53 % Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 17.2 % 96.9 % 79.7 % Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 98.5 % against 17.2 % in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2021.
What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
81.3 %, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 12th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 16th of 17 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/least-developed-countries-ldcs/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/least-developed-countries-ldcs/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 4,414 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.