Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
9.8 %
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
95.2 %
in 2021
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
21st
Papua New Guinea rank
22nd

Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Papua New Guinea
020406080100200020102021

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 95.2 % against 9.8 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 85.4 %.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 9.7 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 37 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2010s 14.16 % 95.73 % 81.57 % Papua New Guinea
2020s 13.3 % 94.45 % 81.15 % Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 95.2 % against 9.8 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2021.
What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
85.4 %, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Papua New Guinea?
12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 21st and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereal-import-dependency-ratio-percent-3-year-average-value/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/papua-new-guinea/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Papua New Guinea: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
212 places, 4,414 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.