Eastern Africa vs Montenegro: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Eastern Africa
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 96.1 % against 18.1 % in Eastern Africa, a difference of 78 %.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 5.3 times Eastern Africa's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Eastern Africa ranks 15th and Montenegro ranks 21st of 37 groups.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.8 % | 94.54 % | 78.74 % | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 17 % | 95.98 % | 78.98 % | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 18.25 % | 96.1 % | 77.85 % | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Eastern Africa or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 96.1 % against 18.1 % in Eastern Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Eastern Africa and Montenegro?
- 78 %, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Montenegro?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Eastern Africa and Montenegro rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Eastern Africa ranks 15th and Montenegro ranks 21st of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.