Central Asia vs Gabon: Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value over time
- Central Asia
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 90.6 % against -7.8 % in Central Asia, a difference of 98.4 %.
That makes Gabon's figure about 11.6 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gabon ahead.
Central Asia ranks 28th and Gabon ranks 30th of 37 groups.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.05 % | 82.37 % | 80.32 % | Gabon |
| 2010s | 8.06 % | 84.65 % | 76.59 % | Gabon |
| 2020s | -7.95 % | 89 % | 96.95 % | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value, Central Asia or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 90.6 % against -7.8 % in Central Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value between Central Asia and Gabon?
- 98.4 %, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Gabon?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Central Asia and Gabon rank globally for cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — value?
- Central Asia ranks 28th and Gabon ranks 30th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereal import dependency ratio (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.