Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malawi: Cassava and products β€” Feed

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
11,684 1000 t
in 2023
Malawi
3,726 1000 t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd
Malawi rank
7th

Cassava and products β€” Feed over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Malawi
05.0k10.0k15.0k201020162023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 11,684 1000 t against 3,726 1000 t in Malawi, a difference of 7,958 1000 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 3.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Malawi ranks 7th of 17 regions.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Malawi Difference Ahead
2010s 12,595 1000 t 2,898 1000 t 9,698 1000 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 12,042 1000 t 3,570 1000 t 8,471 1000 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cassava and products β€” feed, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Malawi?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 11,684 1000 t against 3,726 1000 t in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in cassava and products β€” feed between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malawi?
7,958 1000 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malawi?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malawi rank globally for cassava and products β€” feed?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd and Malawi ranks 7th of 17 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cassava and products β€” Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malawi: Cassava and products β€” Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cassava-and-products-feed/least-developed-countries-ldcs/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cassava-and-products-feed/least-developed-countries-ldcs/malawi/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malawi: Cassava and products β€” Feed</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cassava and products β€” Feed
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
154 places, 1,956 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.