Congo vs Middle Africa: Brans — Stock Variation
Brans — Stock Variation over time
- Congo
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.
Congo ranks 22nd and Middle Africa ranks 20th of 85 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Middle Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -155.56 t | -600 t | 444.44 t | Congo |
| 1970s | -160 t | -160 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | -500 t | -1,400 t | 900 t | Congo |
| 1990s | 300 t | 1,600 t | 1,300 t | Middle Africa |
| 2000s | -2,000 t | -2,000 t | 0 t | — |
| 2010s | 6,250 t | 6,250 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher brans — stock variation, Congo or Middle Africa?
- Congo, at 0 t against 0 t in Middle Africa as of 2013.
- What is the difference in brans — stock variation between Congo and Middle Africa?
- 0 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Middle Africa?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Middle Africa rank globally for brans — stock variation?
- Congo ranks 22nd and Middle Africa ranks 20th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.