Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Brans — Feed

Australia
621,021 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand
697,454 t
in 2013
Australia rank
39th
Australia and New Zealand rank
36th

Brans — Feed over time

  • Australia
  • Australia and New Zealand
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119872013

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 697,454 t against 621,021 t in Australia, a difference of 76,433 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 39th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th of 171 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 436,340 t 479,324 t 42,984 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 431,698 t 478,497 t 46,799 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 463,405 t 510,995 t 47,590 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 585,144 t 641,749 t 56,605 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 661,577 t 720,522 t 58,945 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 565,572 t 638,363 t 72,790 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher brans — feed, Australia or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 697,454 t against 621,021 t in Australia as of 2013.
What is the difference in brans — feed between Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
76,433 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Australia and New Zealand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for brans — feed?
Australia ranks 39th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Brans — Feed. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-feed/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-feed/australia/australia-and-new-zealand/">Australia vs Australia and New Zealand: Brans — Feed</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Brans — Feed
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,338 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.