Austria vs United Republic of Tanzania: Brans — Export Quantity

Austria
177,802 t
in 2013
United Republic of Tanzania
138,922 t
in 2013
Austria rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Brans — Export Quantity over time

  • Austria
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119872013

How they compare

Austria currently reports 177,802 t against 138,922 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 38,880 t.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Austria ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 151 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 11.11 t 16,505 t 16,494 t United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 32.7 t 15,959 t 15,926 t United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 4,090 t 1,402 t 2,688 t Austria
1990s 15,308 t 4,004 t 11,303 t Austria
2000s 81,593 t 60,730 t 20,863 t Austria
2010s 159,267 t 132,745 t 26,522 t Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher brans — export quantity, Austria or United Republic of Tanzania?
Austria, at 177,802 t against 138,922 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2013.
What is the difference in brans — export quantity between Austria and United Republic of Tanzania?
38,880 t, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and United Republic of Tanzania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Austria and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for brans — export quantity?
Austria ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Brans — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs United Republic of Tanzania: Brans — Export Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-export-quantity/austria/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/brans-export-quantity/austria/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Austria vs United Republic of Tanzania: Brans — Export Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Brans — Export Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
192 places, 9,150 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.